WebSite  

Column


ZIM TEL DIRECTORY

RSS Feeds
Preview Chanel Zimbabwe
Preview Chanel Sports
Preview Chanel Column
Preview Chanel Africa

NEWS ON CELLPHONE




PicknBuy24.com
Japanese Used Car Online Shop
Buy
Used ISUZU ELF Online
______________
*Autorec Direct Imports
*
Cheap _Japanese used cars*

Exportjapanesecar.com
Cheap _Japanese used vehicles



web log statistics

Home > HOME > Biti blocking operationalisation of inputs from SA

Biti blocking operationalisation of inputs from SA


The Herald/TZG

Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:17:00 +0000



THE Minister of Finance Tendai Biti has spurned repeated attempts by Pretoria and a South African company to fully operationalise the US$210 million inputs scheme, in the process jeopardising the 2009/2010 cropping season, according to a report in the state run Herald newspaper.

The paper claims that South Africa’s Finance Ministry and ASP Marketing have made frantic efforts to get Biti to sign a guarantee that will unlock thousands of tonnes of fertilizer and seeds.

Biti is reported as saying that documents held by the paper were fake.

"He refused to look at the documents and — after having said he had never spoken to ASP —oddly enough added that he had given them 'all the documents they need', said a report in The Herald.

"I speak to Parvin Gordhan (SA Finance Minister) almost every day and there is nothing like this," Biti was quoted as saying.

However, the documents tell a different story.

Government on September 9 entered into an agreement with ASP for the supply of inputs through the ministries of Finance and Agriculture, and CBZ Bank as lead financial institution.

ASP undertook to supply Zimbabwe with grain and inputs worth US$114 million while supplies worth the remaining US$96 million would come from AIG.

The inputs would be distributed at GMB depots via a loan facility largely overseen by CBZ.

ASP asked for a 10 percent down payment before they could move the inputs.

The money was paid a month after the signing, but an irrevocable letter of credit and Government guarantee as stipulated in the contract have not materialised and ASP has in turn found it difficult to finance the movement of the inputs.

ASP needed the guarantee to get its bankers, Absa, to release funding for the project.

Indications are Minister Biti refused to process these documents and a Government guarantee covering US$43,63 million was only issued by Acting Finance Minister Elton Mangoma on October 8 when the substantive minister was out of the country on official business.

This was after Reverend Frank Chikane, formerly director-general in ex-president Thabo Mbeki’s office and the Chief Secretary to the Office of the President and Cabinet, Dr Misheck Sibanda, had been dragged in.

A letter from Rev Chikane to Dr Sibanda on October 19 confirms as much.

"Your intervention assisted greatly as the Acting Minister of Finance immediately sent a ‘Government guarantee’ letter dated 8th October 2009 to ASP Marketing," Rev Chikane said.

However, when ASP took the guarantee to Absa, the South African bank rejected it saying it did not meet expectations.

On November 3, Mr Keith Dutch —an Absa official — wrote to ASP saying: "I have reviewed the Zimbabwean Government guarantee and comment as follows: Document provides little comfort certainly when viewed as security for a B2B (bank-to-bank) with the SA government (No SA entity is mentioned in the document)."

They felt Minister Mangoma’s guarantee only implied backing for CBZ in the event that farmers defaulted on the loaned inputs but gave no security to ASP that Government would indeed pay them for bringing the seeds and fertilizers to Zimbabwe in the first place.

Rev Chikane suggested that the matter be taken up at a government-to-government level.

He wrote to Dr Sibanda saying: "The challenge they (ASP) are now facing though is that their bank (Absa) in South Africa is not able to release the necessary capital to finance the purchase and supply of said inputs . . .

"I have since talked to senior officials in the Department of Finance in South Africa and they are of the view that if the Government of Zimbabwe (through your Ministry of Finance) were to request for such support it would in all likelihood be favourably considered.

"As you would know, I do not really have authority on this matter as I am no longer in Government.

"It would therefore be helpful if the Ministry of Finance of the Government of Zimbabwe could take up the matter directly with the Ministry of Finance in South Africa.

"I have sent a letter to the Minister of Finance to advise accordingly in this regard and hope that the ministry will consider this approach as a way of unlocking the delivery of these inputs which are urgently needed in Zimbabwe.

"ASP has assured us that they are ready to deliver all the inputs requested as a matter of urgency once they have received such a guarantee to enable their bank to release the funds.

"ASP is also mindful of the deadlines related to the rainy season of Zimbabwe."

After that, ASP officials visited the SA Finance Ministry and were given the assurance that any such request from Minister Biti would be actively supported and the inputs would soon be released.

However, indications are that Zimbabwe’s Finance Ministry did not take up the offer.

Keen to assist Zimbabwe, SA Finance Minister Gordhan went to the extent of drafting the kind of letter requesting support that Minister Biti should send to him.

"Minister Gordhan basically wrote a letter to himself and simply asked Minister Biti to put a Zimbabwe Government letterhead on it and append his signature to it.

"The letter would be sent back and would be used by the South African government to unlock funding so that the inputs would start moving," officials close to the developments revealed.

The strategy was for South Africa to unveil R500 million in budgetary support that Pretoria said it would extend to Zimbabwe in March last year and the money would be used to kick-start ASP’s procurement and distribution.

The draft, dated October 27, 2009, reads in part: "We recognise that the processes of establishing government guarantees may take a while and we will certainly miss the deadline of the 2009-2010 rainy season.

"Accordingly, we would like to make a special request that your government allow us to either use the budget support you generously granted us (for urgent infrastructure projects) to secure these urgently needed inputs or use the budget support as a guarantee for the lines of credit provided for in the contract between the Government of Zimbabwe and ASP.

"A guarantee against RSA resources will give confidence to ASP bankers to release the necessary funds to finance the supply of agricultural commodities i.e maize, seeds and fertilizers.

"We would be grateful indeed if our request can receive your urgent and favourable consideration in order to ensure the recovery of the economy and to obviate a potential food shortage in 2010-11."

The copy of the letter held by The Herald shows Minister Biti never signed and sent it back.

Yesterday he denied its existence and said if The Herald indeed did have it, then it was fake.

Finance Ministry sources, however, said he saw the letter and blew a fuse.

"He did not take kindly to getting a draft of a letter written by South Africans which he was only required to officialise. He said he did not need anyone to teach him his job."

ASP representatives have written letters to various Government officials indicating dismay at what they perceive as lack of co-operation.

In one of them, dated October 9 and directed to Reserve Bank Governor Dr Gideon Gono, a representative says: "The delay on the part of the Government of Zimbabwe heavily compromises the nature of our business in the long term."

An ASP official told The Herald: "We have gone out of our way to help with inputs and grain. The SA government has also gone out of its way but nothing is moving.

"What is our interest? Yes, there is a profit motive. We are a grain trading company and we have been dealing with the Government of Zimbabwe for over 20 years now.

"We don’t understand these sudden delays when the rainy season has already started.

"We always get assurances that things will soon move but nothing materialises.

"We don’t want to get into a situation where we look as if we are deliberately sabotaging your agricultural season by not supplying inputs so that we can get a bulkier and more lucrative contract to supply food aid next year." -- The Herald/TZG


Bookmark and Share  

ADVERTISEMENT


 

ARTICLE ATTACHMENTS

READER OPINIONS

n/a • n/a
Subject: n/a
Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:30:48
• Wamambo-Exhibiting this level of ignorance in this day and age where information is readily available at the press of a button is inexcusable. The land reforms in Zimbabwe have not been a failure. During the 2008/2009 cropping season, Zimbabwe doubled its maize output. The reasons why Zimbabwean farmers’ productivity has been affected are varied but prohibitive costs of inputs, lack of finance, droughts and sanctions have been major factors. In Malawi, the govt has attributed the rise in maize production to subsidised fertiliser. For instance in 2004, the price of 50kg of fertiliser was around K4000 (about US$27) and in 2007, the govt brought it down to K950 (about US$6.50). This made a hell of a difference on the ground as more farmers were able to access the fertiliser and increase the acreage of maize grown. (Source: Malawi: Subsidising agriculture is not enough
http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?ReportID=76591). It is also interesting to note that it is black small scale farmers in Malawi who have increased maize production in that country. I thought the likes of you are for ever telling the world that black people have no farming skills. In Zimbabwe, the govt could not meaningfully provide subsidies because of the sanctions imposed by the West. Some white Zimbabwean farmers who had ventured into Malawi to make a go of commercial farming in that country had to give up and return to Zimbabwe because of lack of funding (Source: Zimbabwe: White farmers begin returning home http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?ReportID=73259). So Wamambo, finance is important if one wants to make a success of farming. That is why the west supports its farmers by giving them millions of US dollars in subsidies. It is only silly banks in Zimbabwe that cannot use a 99 year old land lease as collateral. Give the farmers in Zimbabwe access to affordable inputs and as they say the rest will be history. The farmers in Zimbabwe have not failed but the land reform program is being deliberately sabotaged to make it fail. In the 1980/1990s, it was the black small scale farmers who fed the nation of Zimbabwe by producing over 70% of the maize. They earned Zimbabwe the accolade of breadbasket of Africa.You kind of propaganda, Wamambo is getting a bit tedious.


wamambo • wamambo@gmail.com
Subject: capital is the challenge
Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:45:33
• i think the land reform has failed already...there is nothing more embarassing than importing maize from Malawi...a country that could not get its act together up to 6 years ago when the land reform was started...in all fairness the challenge for the new farmer is capital and the banks just wont provide capital without the right collateral cos a lease will not work.


n/a • n/a
Subject: n/a
Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:40:49
• All that the farmers have to do is to march to Biti's offiice and demand that he signs the necessary papers pronto and dispatch them immediately to SA. Who the hell does Biti think he is? He should not be playing politics with people's lives. Can someone tell Biti that the people of Zimbabwe are his masters not the other way round?
The Zimbabwean farmers demand that he releases the money now so that they can get their inputs . Good rains mean a good harvest provided inputs are availed at the right time. Biti is using delaying tactics to sabotage this cropping season. His party(The MDC-T) called for sanctions to be imposed by the West and these sanctions have devastated millions of lives in Zimbabwe. Now Biti is playing god once again with Zimbabwean lives by dilly dallying with the financial resources meant to purchase the farming inputs. If this farming season is not a succcess, the blame for failure should rest squarely with Biti and his MDC-T party who clearly want to use starvation and poverty to advance their political careers.Biti and his colleagues seem hell bent to ensure that the land reforms are a failure.Zimbabweans do not want the begging bowl to be out for food aid next year, Biti.Take note.And for the scoundrels who are selling fake maize seed as part of the sabotage program, they should be given life sentences when caught.



SUBMIT
YOUR OPINION

Please make sure you fill in all sections for your post to be submitted. Use n/a if not submitting details. The submission code below is case-sensitive. Also make sure you get confirmation that your comment has been submitted.


Name
Email
Subject
Opinion (Limit 2,000 characters)


TOP STORIES
 


PICTURE GALLERY


HOME
Zimbabwe's sovereignty non-negotiable: Pres


HOME
Haiti: 200,000 may be dead, tensions

 


2005-2008 The Zimbabwe Guardian (www.talkzimbabwe.com). All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement