WebSite    

Column





ZIM TEL DIRECTORY

RSS Feeds
Preview Chanel Zimbabwe
Preview Chanel Sports
Preview Chanel Column
Preview Chanel Africa

NEWS ON CELLPHONE


PicknBuy24.com
Japanese Used Car Online Shop
Buy Used ISUZU ELF Online
______________

Autorec Direct Imports
Cheap used Japanese cars
http://www.autorec.co.jp







web log statistics

 

Home > Opinion > A constitutional crisis has been created in Zimbabwe

A constitutional crisis has been created in Zimbabwe


Levi Mhaka ─ Opinion

Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000



ROBERT Mugabe has made sure that the results of the presidential election are not announced while he and his fellow colleagues in the party are to working behind the scenes preparing for a re-run after the release of the presidential election results.


 

Vice Presidents are a type of ministers, albeit senior ones. Their tenure arising out of general and presidential elections, together with that of ministers and deputy ministers are provided for under section 31E (1) (c) of the Constitution.

 

Firstly, it was unconstitutional for President Robert Mugabe to have dissolved the Cabinet on 27th March 2008 two days before election day because according to section 31E (1) of the Constitution, the tenure of “the office of a Vice-President, Minister or Deputy Minister shall become vacant

 

(a) if the President removes him from office; or

(b) if he resigns his office by notice in writing addressed and delivered to the President; or
(c) upon the assumption of office of a new President.”

 

Neither of these three instances above apply when Mugabe "fired" his vice presidents, ministers and deputy ministers by dissolving the Cabinet.

 

Secondly, in trying to fill in the ministerial vacuum, the public pronouncements by the former ministers and deputy ministers (like Bright Matonga) are illegal and mischievous.

 

A former ambassador to China, Chris Mutsvangwa, who lost in the Norton constituency, has been pontificating as the government spokesman.  

 

Thirdly, the country has had no Cabinet since 27th March 2008 until the presidential election results have been announced. If there is to be a re-run, there will not be a Cabinet for the next 21 days (at a minimum) during which the election will be held.

 

This means the president is currently running the country by himself and together with the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) Governor, Gideon Gono, the Presidential spokesman, George Charamba (aka Nathaniel Manheru and "Editor-in-Chief" of Zimbabwe Newspapers Ltd and ZTV News), some excitable bureaucrats and senior securocrats, plus some few loud mouthed ZANU PF officials.  

 

In the absence of a parliament to hold him accountable, Mugabe is busy working on his political survival and protection of his legacy. The Executive institutional functions of the State of Zimbabwe as provided for by section 31H (1) of the Constitution have irretrievably been broken down since “the executive authority of Zimbabwe shall vest in the President and, subject to the provisions of this Constitution, may be exercised by him directly or through the Cabinet, a Vice-President, a Minister or a Deputy Minister.” 

 

Related to this section 31 H (5) stipulates that “in the exercise of his functions the President shall act on the advice of the Cabinet, except in cases where he is required by this Constitution or any other law to act on the advice of any other person or authority…”

 


Levi Mhaka

Harare


 


Bookmark and Share  

ADVERTISEMENT


 

ARTICLE ATTACHMENTS

READER OPINIONS

james huni • mike@yahoo.com
Subject: Zimbabwe is the hunted, vanhuwe
Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:25:37
• murikuwona here how mbeki is sabotaging zimbabwe, ignoring the SADC summit, demoting it in favour of intimate discussions with a dictator. SA is benefitting from ZimIssue, lots of skilled labour coming to SA. I think the agenda for Mbeki is to cause dissolution of Zim, leading to the annexation of Zim as an SA province. Watch my words. Tsvangirai needs to think like a realpolitik, he is currently outmanuvered.


Omuhle • n/a
Subject: n/a
Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:28:58
• Eh, vane mhanza dzasvika kumusana. I don't know if my comment will be posted. A few have strangely disappeared as the eidtor hates those who tell him the truth.
Anyway, Mugabe dissolved cabinet right? we agree on that. Matonga and co are all in cabinet and as it is dissolved they can speak to the press but not be refered to as govt psokesmen because there is no cabinet. Infact to further strengthen Mahak's argument, all they have said in recent weeks has had nothing to do with govt but is explaining ZANU PF positions so they are now party spokesmen just as Charamba is now a candidate's spokesman.
This is again one of the various institutions we will need to address upon our formal independence. There is a distinction between the state and the party. ZANU PF has clouded these waters for too long now that even learned men like Gwagwa are taking this position as established gospel in the functions of a democracy.


Levi Mhaka • levimhaka@yahoo.com
Subject: Constitutional Crisis
Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:07:49
• Arthur - May you kindly simplify your verbose response.

The simple matter is that we dont have a cabinet in Zimbabwe because it was dissolved.


Arthur Gwagwa • arthurgwagwa@yahoo.com
Subject: Dissenting view
Sat, 05 Apr 2008 12:17:22
• With due respect, I dont totally agree with your conclusion Levi. If you say the dissolution of the cabinet was unconstitutional which appears to be the correct construction of of Section 31E (1), then it means that the dissolution is legally inconsequential. In such a case, Bright Matonga is still vested with the authority to speak in an official capacity until a new cabinet assumes office.

On the flip side of my argument, the removal contemplated by sub paragragh (a) would practically cover dissolution because dissolution is a form of removal or has the same consequences as removal if one goes beyond a literal interpretation. If one were to go by this latter argument, then Bright Matonga would not have any official authority to speak as a minister but as a ZANU PF member.

In conclusion, your two arguments are tenable if taken separately but are mutually inconsistent if read together. I stand to be corrected if I am wrong, my knowlegde might be outdated.



SUBMIT
YOUR OPINION

Please make sure you fill in all sections for your post to be submitted. Use n/a if not submitting details. The submission code below is case-sensitive. Also make sure you get confirmation that your comment has been submitted.
Name
Email
Subject
Opinion (Limit 2,000 characters)


TOP STORIES
 

PICTURE GALLERY

Home
President Mugabe in Sirte for AU

Home
Michael Jackson dies aged

_uacct = "UA-792132-2"; urchinTracker();


2005-2008 The Zimbabwe Guardian (www.talkzimbabwe.com). All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement