|
Obama should not be a trophy president
Sun, 09 Nov 2008 13:21:00 +0000
|
|
|
ZIMBABWEANS everywhere celebrated the election of Senator Barack Obama as President of the United States of America and so did many Africans and African-Americans who are now hopeful that with this Black man in the driving seat, there is hope for a seismic policy shift in the United States and a reconnection with the rest of the world.
One of the reasons why Sen. Obama was elected, besides the effectiveness of his campaign, his intelligence and his powers of oratory, is because many people were fed up with Washington and its policies which are divorced from reality. Many people questioned the war in Iraq and America’s unilateralism or aggression towards weaker states.
Sen. Obama got support from many people who were fed up with the detached leadership of George W. Bush, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. Many people do not doubt the sincerity of these men when they say they want to protect their countries’ democracy from being threatened. We believe them. We do not think they are inherently bad people and when they wake up everyday and look in the mirror, they truly see themselves as good people who want to make change and protect their countries.
But they forgot one thing: There are many countries in the world, not just their own. There are so many interests in the world. There are also good countries outside of the G7/G8 fold. There are also very important countries elsewhere in the world that could help their own countries achieve their objectives.
For instance, Britain and the US are now looking to China and the Arab world to help resolve the global financial crisis. Gordon Brown last week said he was asking Arab countries to contribute to the International Monetary Fund to help resolve the global financial crisis. He qualified his statement by saying he was not going with a “begging bowl”. But we know he was. He was in that region three months ago, trying to persuade them to reduce oil prices again with no “begging bowl”.
President Bush is looking to China – whom America already owes trillions of dollars – to help bail them out, yet we hear (in Bush and president-elect Obama) that America is still the strongest country in the world. It is no longer. There has been a power shift in the world and the countries of South East Asia are changing the global power distribution, and the West has to look elsewhere for cues.
President-elect Obama will have to show that he can bridge that divide – that he can make the connections that Bush and his Allies failed to make, if the world is going to be a better place – after all he campaigned on that ticket and the world is watching.
President-elect Obama will also have to fight for the connection of Washington and those who have fought for civil rights, for so many years in America. He is their only hope and he campaigned on that ticket too, although he specifically avoided mention of those two words in his campaign – ‘civil rights’. Nowhere did we hear Sen. Obama campaign for civil rights, which is one reason why the Rev. Jesse Jackson made the lurid comments he made about him, for which he later apologized.
Rev. Jackson who shed tears on the eve of Sen. Obama’s election, could have had a mixture of emotions – that finally a Black man was going to be President, but also that the speech made was devoid of direct talk about civil rights and about the plight of Blacks in America, who suffered years of slavery and second-class citizenship – are still suffering today. Rev. Jackson was there on the fateful night when Rev. Martin Luther King was assassinated and these events are very significant to him and the Black (minority) people he represents. He was a presidential hopeful himself, who campaigned on a “civil rights ticket” in the eighties.
We cannot prejudge President-elect Obama. He has shown some leadership thus far, but we also remember that he made a speech to the US Senate on March 15 2007 to the effect that “regime change” should be supported in Zimbabwe. He has also reached out to MDC leader, Morgan Tsvangirai, but not President Mugabe. We believe that for Sen. Obama to understand the true picture of Zimbabwe, and before he makes public statements about Zimbabwe, he should reach out to stakeholders in the country. The MDC leader is not infallible and neither is President Mugabe. Any outsider who wants to understand the struggles that Zimbabwe has gone through, is going through, will go through, will have to reach out to all persuasions in the country.
Just like we will not prejudge the Black President-elect, he should not prejudge our country, but should help resolve our crisis – and the crisis of the many millions of Blacks, Hispanics, Indians and other minorities in America.
We hope ‘President Obama’ will not be a token president who will be used by the powers-that-be in Washington to justify Black inclusion in American politics knowing fully well that the levers of power are still in the white-controlled institutions crafted centuries ago. Obama has made a giant step, but the small strides being made by Black people daily are very crucial as well.
Trevor Philips, Chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality in Britain made an interesting observation this weekend. As one of the most prominent civil rights campaigners in Britain, Philips told The Times newspaper: “If Barack Obama had lived here (in Britain) I would be very surprised if even somebody as brilliant as him would have been able to break through the institutional stranglehold that there is on power within the Labour Party.” It has to be said that the same “institutional stranglehold” is still existent in America. We wait to see whether Obama’s appointments will reflect the racial composition of the United States. He should not favour Blacks simply because he is Black, but he should not just favour Whites as well. He should strike a balance in appointments and include skilled Blacks, Indians, Hispanics, etc in his administration.
Those who have been following the campaigns by Sen. Obama will agree that he ran a spirited, rainbow campaign. His rallies were filled with all races and he was loved by everyone. He had record attendances in Berlin, Germany. That spirit should be carried forward to his administration – he should have a rainbow administration.
Indications so far are that there will be very few changes in Washington, which is sad. If, as President, Obama does not address the plight of the Black and minority populations in America, it will take centuries to address those issues and Obama will only remain as a token President to silent those who thought America was never ready for a Black President.
If he manages to address those issues he would have created a precedent that will have a domino effect on the rest of future administrations in America (Black-led or White-led). He will be the standard by which to measure any future administration’s efforts at extending civil liberties to minority groups.
That Sen. Obama chastised those people who did not believe in what he termed “American democracy” at his winning speech in Chicago on Tuesday last week, was unfortunate. Many of those people who did not believe in “American democracy” are the suffering populations in America – the Blacks, Hispanics, the Indians and others. These communities have been at the receiving end of the brutality of a system Obama was fighting in his campaign.
Interesting last note: Sen. Obama’s speech to hundreds of thousands of supporters in Chicago – one of the most widely-watched and repeated political addresses in recent history was partly written in a flat in Notting Hill, West London by a twenty-seven year old White man. Nothing wrong with the skin colour of the speech-writer, but when the speech fails to address the issues of civil liberties that have been at the forefront of Black and minority campaign for many years and fails to mention the forerunner to the cause (like Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Rev. Jesse Jackson), one wonders what type of administration to expect under “President Barack Obama”.
philipmurombedzi@yahoo.com
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
ARTICLE ATTACHMENTS
|
|
 |
|
N/A • N/A Subject: Obama Sun, 09 Nov 2008 19:53:57 • I share Simpson's views on the Obama presidency. The question is who will be pulling the strings will it be the Money Masters (the rich bankers) and the usual Washington crowd. Time will tell. Yes, we are all awating to see whether he carries out the same failed Bush policies with regards to Zimbabwe. If Obama really believes in freedom and liberty, then the first thing he should do is to repeal the Zidera Act,2001 and lift sanctions against Zim. Why is the US public allowing their govt to make the Zim economy scream and thereby impoverish its people. Zimbabweans have no quarrel with the American people.
Simpson • n/a Subject: Waiting to see Sun, 09 Nov 2008 16:59:43 • Am a bit sceptical as well - but being as intelligent as he is, Africa wait to see the change it can believe in. That means revisiting american foreign policy in Africa under Bush administration.
Surely if Bush was a disaster at home - he could not have been right away from home. Interestingly, in Zim MDC-T have been enjoying cosy relations with the republicans. Chematama and Mcgee are best of mates, but i was surprised to hear Biti congratulating Obama and refering to Bush as being arrogant. It was the first time any MDC-T official has ever seen anything wrong with the Bush administration.
Obama is going to be tested in the way he is going to deal with the Palestine/Israel conflict, Iran and Zimbabwe. Surely if he represents change that we can all believe in, then Obama must revisit the Bush admin`s policy towards these case studies. He only need to listen to their side of the story and make an informed judgement from facts not from manufactured, stage-managed events.
My only fear is that the american institutions not presidency direct foreign policy and as such Obama may not be able to have any influence at all.
However, as the occupier of the most prestigious house in the world, he should be able to engage these countries not to ostracise based on lies. He shd also not be too close to Brown for that matter - but make independent judgements.
Interesting events are already happening - Claire short is leading a european delegation to Palestine to fight for their oppression from Israel, not sure why at this moment taking into account Short wrote that infamous Zim letter and served in a labour gvt for a long time without taking this radical step. could it be anything to do with making Obama`s presidential tenure difficult, given the fact that Obama`s campaign team was led by jews.
For the first time, sky news had the headline in bold red :Hamas willing to speak to Obama. Very strange indeed since hamas has always been referred to as a terrorist organisation.
I think we are going to see many more interesting developments - however if the developments helps in making the world a fairer place, including Uk paying for land reform in zim without weird conditions, or speeding up real land reform and empowering the black populace in south africa then we would welcome them.
We wait and see.
|
SUBMIT YOUR OPINION
Please make sure you fill in all sections for your post to be submitted. Use n/a if not submitting details. The submission code below is case-sensitive. Also make sure you get confirmation that your comment has been submitted.
|
| |
|